Or was it a popularity contest? I agree that John Howard has all the charisma of a John Howard, but I can't believe that people think Rudd has much more.
I started off with the decision: to worm or not to worm. As it turns out, I should have taken my Combantrin and watched the ABC. The 60 minutes audience were voting before anything was said. Literally. It simply made the worm irrelevant, except for the relative difference between what each leader had to say about any particular topic, or who seemed to be more credible about one topic or another. I must say that I did laugh a couple of times. Once, in a slip of the most Freudian kind, Rudd almost said "Mr Coward" instead of "Mr Howard" until he caught himself.
I'll divide this post into two parts, the synopsis, and the blow by blow commentary.
SYNOPSIS
Rudd wins when they talk about:
- Tax on higher income earners
- Kyoto
- George Bush
Howard wins when they talk about:
- Unions
- Practical environment solutions
- China
Pretty even on other things, like Indigenous affairs, Iraq, education, interest rates, inflation, child care.
It seemed the risks for both sides are with the team they have behind them. Johnny got poor marks when Turnbull and Costello are mentioned, and likewise Rudd when Combet and Shorten are spoken about.
COMMENTARY
I did like that the cricket analogy was used at the start. The PM sent Kevvy in to bat.
The Labour innings went like this....
The Labour openers score well with a few beautiful cut shots to the boundary in the first over. The cost of living comments are paying off well for Rudd.
After 10 overs, it's 0/65.
Johnny is still flat. But then he changes bowlers, brings on the spinners. Let's not get back to the old days with Union bosses!
After 20 overs, it's looking better for the home side. Both openers are back in the pavilion and it's 2/112.
Some comments about TV ads and broadband help the batting side here. It looks like those two wickets have not slowed down the scoring at all.
After 30 overs, it's 2/187.
Oh no, a dropped catch for the government. Why did he confirm that Costello would be the next captain! And he's doing a great job as vice captain now!
After 40 overs, it's moved on to 2/261. It looks like a big score to chase down.
More talk about unions, this should help the bowlers. And yes, finally the breakthrough! Comments about union financial support to the Labour party brings about a run-out. The new batsman to the crease is not fazed, the very next ball is launched over the boundary for six! Apparently people like what the unions did with James Hardie victims!
At the end of their 50 overs, the visitors (and the favourites by the way) and well in command, amassing a score of 3/339.
Now the home side is in to bat.
Poor start, no wickets but a slow run-rate. We shouldn't remind the public that the government have been in power for so long.
After 10 overs, 0/29. It's a long way home from here.
Wicket! A tax refund on computers yorks the batsman and knocks the middle stump out of the ground. Then more wickets tumble. Interest rates take their toll. A dodgy lbw decision makes things worse.
After 20 overs, 4/75. But it looks like rain.
Masterstroke from the PM! He calls Rudd pathetic! Brilliant batting PM! And it's a rain dance that has worked, the rain tumbles down and the covers go on.
This doesn't look good, we may not get a result.
But wait, it looks like things are clearing up. And yes, it's been announced that play will resume shortly. The revised target is 265 off 38 overs.
Back in the middle, the PM lays it all out, making statements about union policy on full employment being put aside over workplace control. Bit it's a swing and miss I'm afraid Johnny!
The next few overs pass and the battle is even.
After 30 overs, the government have regained some ground, but the win looks out of reach. 6/145. 120 needed off just 8 overs.
Nice play again from the PM. He needs to stay at the crease if the government are to have any hope in this match. Great hook shot over the link between the environment and the economy - good scoring opportunities here. 16 off that over!
Turnbull is out! Or is he? There's mass confusion in the middle. The PM backs Turnbull over bush and the crowd doesn't know whether to cheer or boo! The 3rd umpire gives him out. A good innings but now it's 7/199. 66 needed in 4 overs.
Trump cards now, talk about APEC and getting China to talk to the USA. Four! Four! Four! This is getting close!
No! Don't talk about Bush! Howard is out! 8/231.
Terrorism threat increased or decreased since Iraq? Out! 9/235.
Labour brings his strike bowler back straight away. Combat troops will be withdrawn from Iraq next year. But the edge goes through the slips! Missed chance there!
Are you sorry Johnny? Are you sorry that you're not sorry? No! It's disrespectful! Six! 9/250.
Just 14 needed off the last over.
Big Mal is at the crease now. Go Mal, Go Mal!
Four, Two, Dot, Two, Four!
Just two needed to win off the last ball!
Edged through cover, they get the first, coming back for the second, The return is fired in at the keeper..... and .... a run-out is it? Yes! it's a run-out! It's a tie! It's a hung debate.
More like a mastur-bate. It really was a wank, a toss, a pull, a slog, a tug, a jack-off.
I don't think it helped anyone make any decisions. I think it's foregone who Australia likes the most. We just won't know if this translates into votes.
I vote for Ray Martin. Or that dude from SkyNews, whoever he was.
Better yet, I vote for me.
Vote M for PM!
I'll give you free broadband, but you have to have my blog as your homepage. Deal?